redistrictingmajorityproject.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the redistrictingmajorityproject.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host redistrictingmajorityproject.com. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is Unified Layer .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called nginx/1.14.0 containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

home about redistricting in your state a-k alabama alaska arizona arkansas california colorado connecticut delaware florida georgia hawaii idaho illinois indiana iowa kansas kentucky l – n louisiana maine maryland massachusetts michigan minnesota mississippi missouri montana nebraska nevada new hampshire new jersey new mexico new york north carolina north dakota o – w ohio oklahoma oregon pennsylvania rhode island south carolina south dakota tennessee texas utah vermont virginia washington west virginia wisconsin wyoming home jul 05 thursday election day 2010 proved to be an even bigger “wave” election at the state level than anticipated. republicans flipped at least 19 legislative bodies to republican control and hold majorities in 10 of the 15 states that will gain or lose u.s. house seats and where the legislature plays a role in redrawing the map. republicans have an opportunity to create 20-25 new republican congressional districts through the redistricting process over the next five election cycles, solidifying a republican house majority. we could not have succeeded and cannot continue to succeed without your support – join us today. newsflash: from the los angeles times a bookstore owner from yolo county, a retired engineer from claremont, an insurance agent from san gabriel and an attorney from norco are among those who will determine how legislative districts are drawn as part of an experiment that promises to drastically change the state’s political landscape. until now, the […] from tribstar.com: when voters head to their polling places on nov. 2, the reapportionment of congressional seats to correspond with census data may not be uppermost in their minds. but redrawing the political boundaries of the state’s voting districts is a coveted task for the party in power. the way the lines are drawn — […] from the associated press: the republicans’ expected gains next week go way beyond congress. the gop could capture new senate or house majorities in a dozen to 18 states — along with critical new power to redraw district maps and influence elections for a decade to come. three of the biggest prizes are new york, […] welcome to this week’s edition of redmap rundown, a synopsis of redistricting news brought to you by the rslc’s redistricting majority project (redmap). this weekly update gives you the latest on what those in the beltway, and across the country, are saying about the impending reapportionment and redistricting process. in this week’s redmap rundown: no […] from the cleveland plain dealer politicos mistook ohio for fantasy island last week. republicans acted as if nov. 2’s election were over — and they’d won everything statewide. republicans, of all people, should know that when everyone says a stock is a sure-thing investment, that actually means, “sell.” then president barack obama swooped in, saying, […] main menu home about redistricting in your state a-k alabama alaska arizona arkansas california colorado connecticut delaware florida georgia hawaii idaho illinois indiana iowa kansas kentucky l – n louisiana maine maryland massachusetts michigan minnesota mississippi missouri montana nebraska nevada new hampshire new jersey new mexico new york north carolina north dakota o – w ohio oklahoma oregon pennsylvania rhode island south carolina south dakota tennessee texas utah vermont virginia washington west virginia wisconsin wyoming archives january 2013 december 2010 november 2010 october 2010 september 2010 august 2010 july 2010 june 2010 may 2010 april 2010 march 2010 february 2010 get daily redmap updates directly to your inbox enter your email address: delivered by feedburner facebook republican state leadership committee on facebook 2012 redmap summary report written by admin friday, 4 january 2013 09:23 redmap how a strategy of targeting state legislative races in 2010 led to a republican u.s. house majority in 2013 on november 6, 2012, barack obama was reelected president of the united states by nearly a three-point margin, winning 332 electoral votes to mitt romney’s 206 while garnering nearly 3.5 million more votes. democrats also celebrated victories in 69 percent of u.s. senate elections, winning 23 of 33 contests. farther down-ballot, aggregated numbers show voters pulled the lever for republicans only 49 percent of the time in congressional races, suggesting that 2012 could have been a repeat of 2008, when voters gave control of the white house and both chambers of congress to democrats. but, as we see today, that was not the case. instead, republicans enjoy a 33-seat margin in the u.s. house seated yesterday in the 113th congress, having endured democratic successes atop the ticket and over one million more votes cast for democratic house candidates than republicans. the only analogous election in recent political history in which this aberration has taken place was immediately after reapportionment in 1972, when democrats held a 50 seat majority in the u.s. house of representatives while losing the presidency and the popular congressional vote by 2.6 million votes. to be sure, the national republican congressional committee (nrcc) built on its strong recruitment and successful strategy that gave them a republican majority in 2010 by going on offense over democratic cuts to medicare and by linking their democratic opponents to president obama’s most unpopular policy proposals. however, all components of a successful congressional race, including recruitment, message development and resource allocation, rest on the congressional district lines, and this was an area where republicans had an unquestioned advantage. today, nearly two months after election day, and one day after the 113th united states congress took the oath of office on capitol hill, the republican state leadership committee (rslc) is releasing this review of its strategy and execution of its efforts in the 2010 election cycle to erect a republican firewall through the redistricting process that paved the way to republicans retaining a u.s. house majority in 2012. … 2010 state elections: redmap’s execution as the 2010 census approached, the rslc began planning for the subsequent election cycle, formulating a strategy to keep or win republican control of state legislatures with the largest impact on congressional redistricting as a result of reapportionment. that effort, the redistricting majority project (redmap), focused critical resources on legislative chambers in states projected to gain or lose congressional seats in 2011 based on census data. the rationale was straightforward: controlling the redistricting process in these states would have the greatest impact on determining how both state legislative and congressional district boundaries would be drawn. drawing new district lines in states with the most redistricting activity presented the opportunity to solidify conservative policymaking at the state level and maintain a republican stronghold in the u.s. house of representatives for the next decade. to fund the initiative, the rslc raised more than $30 million in 2009-2010, and invested $18 million after labor day 2010 alone. specifically, the rslc: spent $1.4 million targeting four new york state senate seats, winning two and control of the new york state senate. (-2 congressional seats). spent nearly $1 million in pennsylvania house races, targeting and winning three of the toughest races in the state. (-1 congressional seat). spent nearly $1 million in ohio house races, targeting six seats, five of which were won by republicans. notably, president obama carried five of these six legislative districts in 2008. (-2 congressional seats). spent $1 million in michigan working with the michigan house republican campaign committee and michigan republican party to pick up 20 seats. (-1 congressional seat). spent $750,000 in texas as part of an effort that resulted in 22 house pick-ups. (+4 congressional seats). spent $1.1 million in wisconsin to ta

URL analysis for redistrictingmajorityproject.com

http://www.redistrictingmajorityproject.com/?page_id=104
http://www.redistrictingmajorityproject.com/?p=607
http://www.redistrictingmajorityproject.com/?page_id=106
http://www.redistrictingmajorityproject.com/?paged=2
http://www.redistrictingmajorityproject.com/?page_id=100
http://www.redistrictingmajorityproject.com/?page_id=168
http://www.redistrictingmajorityproject.com/?page_id=140
http://www.redistrictingmajorityproject.com/?page_id=2
http://www.redistrictingmajorityproject.com/?page_id=142
http://www.redistrictingmajorityproject.com/?page_id=144
http://www.redistrictingmajorityproject.com/?page_id=146
http://www.redistrictingmajorityproject.com/?page_id=128
http://www.redistrictingmajorityproject.com/?page_id=98
http://www.redistrictingmajorityproject.com/?page_id=51
http://www.redistrictingmajorityproject.com/?page_id=122

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: REDISTRICTINGMAJORITYPROJECT.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1585894310_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Updated Date: 2018-05-03T18:03:38Z
Creation Date: 2010-02-18T22:07:25Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2020-02-18T22:07:25Z
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: [email protected]
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 480-624-2505
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: NS1.BLUEHOST.COM
Name Server: NS2.BLUEHOST.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2018-07-25T07:08:01Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR GoDaddy.com, LLC

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =redistrictingmajorityproject.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME redistrictingmajorityproject.com

  CHANGED 2018-05-03

  CREATED 2010-02-18

STATUS
clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited

NSERVER

  NS1.BLUEHOST.COM 162.159.24.80

  NS2.BLUEHOST.COM 162.159.25.175

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .